| Data: | IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) | ||||||||
| Year: | 1960 - 2013 | ||||||||
| Country: | Philippines | ||||||||
| Source: | World Bank (the information in this section is direct quotation from World Bank development data) | ||||||||
| Series Code: | IQ.CPA.IRAI.XQ | ||||||||
| Topic: | Public Sector: Policy & institutions | ||||||||
| Short Definition: | 0 | ||||||||
| Long Definition: | IDA Resource Allocation Index is obtained by calculating the average score for each cluster and then by averaging those scores. For each of 16 criteria countries are rated on a scale of 1 (low) to 6 (high). | ||||||||
| Unit of Measurement: | 0 | ||||||||
| Periodicity: | Annual | ||||||||
| Base Period: | 0 | ||||||||
| Reference Period: | 0 | ||||||||
| Aggregation method: | Unweighted average | ||||||||
| Limitations and exceptions: | The CPIA
exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and
institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the
country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates)
that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More
specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and
institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction
and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance. Myanmar, Somalia and Tuvalu are not included because they were not rated in the 2011 exercise even though they are IDA eligible. |
||||||||
| Notes from original source: | 0 | ||||||||
| General Comments: | 0 | ||||||||
| Original Source: | World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida). | ||||||||
| Statistical concept and methodology: | All
criteria within each cluster receive equal weight, and each cluster has a 25
percent weight in the overall score, which is obtained by averaging the
average scores of the four clusters. For each of the 16 criteria countries
are rated on a scale of 1 (low) to 6 (high). The scores depend on the level
of performance in a given year assessed against the criteria, rather than on
changes in performance compared with the previous year. All 16 CPIA criteria
contain a detailed description of each rating level. In assessing country
performance, World Bank staff evaluate the country's performance on each of
the criteria and assign a rating. The ratings reflect a variety of
indicators, observations, and judgments based on country knowledge and on
relevant publicly available indicators. In interpreting the assessment
scores, it should be noted that the criteria are designed in a
developmentally neutral manner. Accordingly, higher scores can be attained by
a country that, given its stage of development, has a policy and
institutional framework that more strongly fosters growth and poverty
reduction. The country teams that prepare the ratings are very familiar with the country, and their assessments are based on country diagnostic studies prepared by the World Bank or other development organizations and on their own professional judgment. An early consultation is conducted with country authorities to make sure that the assessments are informed by up-to-date information. To ensure that scores are consistent across countries, the process involves two key phases. In the benchmarking phase a small representative sample of countries drawn from all regions is rated. Country teams prepare proposals that are reviewed first at the regional level and then in a Bankwide review process. A similar process is followed to assess the performance of the remaining countries, using the benchmark countries' scores as guideposts. The final ratings are determined following a Bankwide review. The overall numerical IRAI score and the separate criteria scores were first publicly disclosed in June 2006. |
||||||||
| Development relevance: | The
International Development Association (IDA) is the part of the World Bank
Group that helps the poorest countries reduce poverty by providing
concessional loans and grants for programs aimed at boosting economic growth
and improving living conditions. IDA funding helps these countries deal with
the complex challenges they face in meeting the Millennium Development
Goals. The World Bank's IDA Resource Allocation Index (IRAI) is based on the results of the annual Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) exercise, which covers the IDA-eligible countries. Country assessments have been carried out annually since the mid-1970s by World Bank staff. Over time the criteria have been revised from a largely macroeconomic focus to include governance aspects and a broader coverage of social and structural dimensions. Country performance is assessed against a set of 16 criteria grouped into four clusters: economic management, structural policies, policies for social inclusion and equity, and public sector management and institutions. IDA resources are allocated to a country on per capita terms based on its IDA country performance rating and, to a limited extent, based on its per capita gross national income. This ensures that good performers receive a higher IDA allocation in per capita terms. The IRAI is a key element in the country performance rating. |
||||||||

.png)